Terminator 2 is a great movie.
>>By Arnold (Wednesday, 18 Dec 2002 14:11)
It´s really good I love it, I´ve seen it hundred times, but I just want to see it again and again and again and again.
>>By Achwarzenegger (Wednesday, 18 Dec 2002 14:12)
best movie ever to walk on this earth period
>>By gohan (Tuesday, 23 Sep 2003 00:07)
It is a brilliant sequel.
But, after reading some text on the Donnie Darko discussion. I find how the movie dables with time travel rather lazily.
Example: The chip salvaged from the T100 in the first movie was from the future. From it Dyson was instrumental in developing skynet.
Now parallel universe theory I can handle but is this what the creators are suggesting. It's a bit of a mind fuck. A lazy one at that.
The third movie I'm afraid doesn't had nothing to the story.
>>By Trankmast (Sunday, 28 Sep 2003 23:06)
This movie is one hell of a sequel, something you don't see often in hollywood. The only flaws or weak points in the movie are the holes in the story, including the lack of information on time travel that leaves us puzzled. Although this movie is almost perfect, the third addition(T3 Rise of the Machines) almost destroys the value of this film. Edward Furlong goes above and beyond portraying John Conner as an adolescent, and I think the biggest downfall in T3 is the decision to use Nick Stahl as a replacement.
>>By Niche (Monday, 17 Apr 2006 17:59)
ya!!! like i always wondered why didnt the terminators seen back a skin covered weapon??? they said only living tissue can travel back in time but if they can send back a terminator why not a weapon as well like a laser gun with living tissue???
>>By zeromenace (Wednesday, 19 Apr 2006 18:09)
The discussion board is currently closed.