King Kong
Forum
He is a Big Gorilla and Stands 50ft High And Destroys New york
and Got Shot By the Helicopters
after ten years later King Kong is Back to Life in King Kong Lives
(Tuesday, 7 Jan 2003 22:48)
This year i Want King Kong Lives 1986 on DVD in April 2003
and it will Be King Kong Lives on DVD this year in DVD Planet
(Tuesday, 7 Jan 2003 22:49)
Yes i Want King Kong Lives Poster in June 2003
And i Want to See Making of King Kong Lives 1986 on DVD
>>By Junior (Tuesday, 7 Jan 2003 22:50)
I Want a Video Game Called King Kong Lives For Nintendo 64 2003
and I Want to Get a Fangoria Book called King Kong Lives Some Heroes Never Die
And i Want to Get King Kong Lives on Soundtrack ape Records
>>By Junior (Tuesday, 7 Jan 2003 22:53)
I Want to Get King Kong 1976 Fangoria Book (Tuesday, 7 Jan 2003 22:54)
I Want to Get a Game Called King Kong vs Godzilla (Tuesday, 7 Jan 2003 22:55)
And i Want to Go to Universal Studios Hollywood and to See a Giant ape Called King Kong
>>By Junior (Tuesday, 7 Jan 2003 22:56)
Linda Hamilton and Brian Kerwin Stars in King Kong Lives 1986 John Guillermin
Peter Elliott Plays King Kong George Yiasoumi Plays Lady Kong
King Kong Is in a Hospital and Dr. Amy Franklin Operates on Kong
Hank Mitchell is a Borneo Hero for Having Running from Lady Kong
and the evil Army Commando Named Colonel Nevitt and Wants to Kill King Kong and Lady Kong
>>By Junior (Tuesday, 7 Jan 2003 23:00)
King Kong is a great movie!! I almost cried at the end of the movie! Poor King Kong!!
>>By A4Asha (Monday, 2 Jan 2006 05:24)
it is said to be a story between a beauty and a beast, but i cannot help thinking it as a story between a beauty and a monster. king kong looks horrible. the movie drags too long, in the second one and an half hour, what i heard most are the screams. but i like the part on the deserted island, that is wonderful imagination.
>>By yunzi (Tuesday, 3 Jan 2006 02:04)
movie was good but too long...too many special effects
>>By jzcmpsr22 (Wednesday, 4 Jan 2006 09:44)
It was a good film, but it did go on a bit long. And yes i did cry!!
>>By Christi (Thursday, 5 Jan 2006 23:11)
i think the special affects make the movie great! and i think peter jackson deserves a lot of credit for bringing this movie back to our screens and for doing the movie justice. I know this was a long movie but i was absolutely enthralled for it i couldnt take my eyes of the screen. Naomi Watts and Adrian Brody were so good.
>>By Too Smart for a nickname (Monday, 9 Jan 2006 16:58)
it was a great film yeah but it really was too long.... but i think thats peter jacksons way... i mean look he did lord of the rings too and they were long... he doesnt like to leave things out... nobody likes shit loads of criticism on something theyve spent along time trying to create so he tries extremely hard to leave nothing unturned i think... but that leads to alot detail and sceens that arnt really necessay or are necessary but extended abit too much, you know what i mean... he tries abit too hard to impress which sometimes spoils the film abit because people think there too long... i mean i went to the cinema to see it and it got half way through and i couldnt believe wed been there an hour an half and there was another half to go... when i left my ass was numb and it put abit of a downer on the experience because instead of being able to enjoy the film i was uncomfortable..
o 2 other criticisms to do with dinosaurs... 1 in the original there is only one t rex.
and two.... watch jurrasic park the graphics are just the same... and that film is how old? youd have thought something new would have been created now a good part of that film was like watching jurrasic park all over again,
>>By spookygoth (Tuesday, 10 Jan 2006 13:01)
I agree with you spooky goth, the dinosaurs are no further advanced than jurassic park wich was 13 years ago!! i live the film but wont watch it too often as it lasts 3 hours. apparently peter jackson deliberately added the extra t rexs.
>>By scarletnikki (Tuesday, 2 May 2006 13:24)
i think he might have added the extra t rex to compensate for the fact that technology has gone no were since jurassic park..lol
I was so dissapointed with that... o man is it really 13 years... that makes me thinkt he dinosaurs were even worse... in 13 years we cant have improved graphics just a little bit.
It really was too long... it would have been good if it wasnt for the length... like i said i got half way through and was waiting for it to end coz i was getting fed up.
>>By spookygoth (Tuesday, 2 May 2006 19:22)
i liked it.. specially the woman. she was nice ;)
>>By miki (Tuesday, 9 May 2006 23:21)
i kinda quite liked the length, it was indulgent,and i like things such as dinosaures,so I was in my element!!
>>By scarletnikki (Tuesday, 9 May 2006 23:53)
why do so many people have a small attention span???
kong was a great film - really liked it. Only 'over the top' bit was the creepily crawling over-sized bugs... but well that was not a huge part of the film - just an excuse to kill of a few characters, namely Andy Serkis' character.
pete jackson's done it again - what is his next film & when is it out??
>>By Tchock (Friday, 12 May 2006 21:37)
haha yes those insects....so gross....
>>By scarletnikki (Monday, 15 May 2006 11:43)
its not like a small attention span its just that the moments like with the dinosaurs or with the bugs they put you in suspense for the next part where somethign happens to turn the situation around..... you leave that going on too long and you lose the mood, that and its really hard to watch a film when you feel like you need to go and stretch your legs half way through it spoils the mood.
>>By spookygoth (Sunday, 21 May 2006 18:55)
The discussion board is currently closed.
|
DISCOVER NEW MOVIES