Wuthering Heights

Forum

This movie was terrible. The 1939 version was so much better, because of the chemistry, the drama, and also Merle Oberon is pretty--not just pretty, gorgeous.

>>By Book-Worm   (Friday, 7 Feb 2003 02:43)



It was amazing.

>>By Hajdie   (Sunday, 16 Feb 2003 14:13)



the 1998 version is far closer to the book and plays out the dynamics of thier relationship way better. i prefer it any day to the earlier version which was autistic.

>>By smellie   (Saturday, 12 Apr 2003 00:40)



the 1998 version was trash. over acted hollywood poo

>>By smellie2   (Saturday, 12 Apr 2003 00:42)



1998 version has added extra stuffs to movie. the scene of kissing to Catherine by Heathcliff was not in book. and some of other parts were also not in book. in movie there is shown more lust than what is in the book.

>>By Viwer   (Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:29)



wuthering heights was a beautiful story

>>By bobba   (Sunday, 29 Jun 2003 02:17)



I think that this was a good adaptation compared to others. Of course it was over acted but what would you expect from a classic romance novel!!

>>By lil   (Sunday, 13 Jul 2003 07:45)



The discussion board is currently closed.