| |
|  |  |
| Discussion: Wuthering Heights This movie was terrible. The 1939 version was so much better, because of the chemistry, the drama, and also Merle Oberon is pretty--not just pretty, gorgeous. >>By Book-Worm It was amazing. >>By Hajdie the 1998 version is far closer to the book and plays out the dynamics of thier relationship way better. i prefer it any day to the earlier version which was autistic. >>By smellie the 1998 version was trash. over acted hollywood poo >>By smellie2 1998 version has added extra stuffs to movie. the scene of kissing to Catherine by Heathcliff was not in book. and some of other parts were also not in book. in movie there is shown more lust than what is in the book. >>By Viwer wuthering heights was a beautiful story >>By bobba I think that this was a good adaptation compared to others. Of course it was over acted but what would you expect from a classic romance novel!! >>By lil You are not logged in. To access all functionality, you can log in via Flork. Flork is a worldwide community of people who are interested in music, movies and books. As a Flork-User, you can participate in this and other discussions, meet new people and exchange messages with other members directly: www.flork.com |